Yingluck presenting sponsor 30 million. Court granted provisional release to look. Filed a bail of 30 million baht declined corruption case after the rice. Court granted temporary release But the conditions are not allowed to leave the country. Appointment exhibits 21 g. This is charged awry. All appointments to the court on 19 May, the Supreme Court's Criminal Division for Holders of Political Positions Rd., Riverside Supreme Court held the first trial. And the testimony The black case together. 22/2558 on the family Winitnaiyapak Attorney General filed a lawsuit as plaintiffs. . Ms.. Yingluck Shinawatra. The defendant guilty of ignoring the wrongful act. And state officials to perform or refrain from performing any position or duties. Or in a position of power or the wrongful act. Under the Criminal Code and an offense under section 157. May. Assoc.'s. Constitution for the Prevention of Corruption (NCC) Act 2542 Section 123/1 of failing to carry out the project on hold veto rice. This makes the damage more than 5 billion baht for the atmosphere in the Supreme Court. Authorities have put the iron fence separating the walkway. To facilitate the litigants. Because there are people waiting to cheer and delivering flowers. . Ms.. Yingluck many police officers in and out of uniform. The Metropolitan Police Division 2 (Bk.n. 2), including more than 500 men to take care of security surrounding the Supreme Court later at 08:40 hrs. hrs. a. Yingluck. With a team of lawyers have come to the court by Mr Saikua former minister of Commerce, Mr. Plodprasop Surasavadee former Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Prompong of the glass Kul Mahattanapreut spokesman for Thailand. Along with the encouragement of their participation. The prosecution led by prosecutor Mr Chai branch organizations Chutikan Director-General, Bureau of Special Investigation. Head of the working group, Mr. Surasak Threerat family. Director-General, Office of Investigations, Mr. Koson Valley Aintu Monday Yong. Deputy Attorney General Working with prosecutors Come and listen to the top . Ms.. Yingluck said it would fight the case to justice. And ensure the purity Do not criticize the readiness for cooperation. The case is currently in the process of court hearings and later, at 10:00. Mr. Weerapol the International Vice President of the Supreme Court. Judge rhetoric owner With tribunal judges, including nine people have sat the bench. To the testimony of the defendant The Court has read the indictment to the defendant to the conclusion that between August 2554 - May 2557 the defendant as prime minister. State officials and officials under the law. Acting Government Administration And was president of the National Rice Policy Committee (the NIA.) The defendant was the prime minister. Paddy Pledging policy action included five projects: 1. rice mortgage scheme during the years 2554-2555 2. Paddy rice is the year 2555 3. Paddy Pledging Scheme during the year 2555-2556 (1) 4. . paddy mortgage scheme 2556 (No. 2) 5 years from 2556 to 2557 paddy mortgage scheme, which during the operation. The rice policy There were protests from several agencies such as the NCC OAG Treasury. Bureau of the Budget And opposition to protest by that. Rice mortgage scheme Are likely to cause damage. Both quality rice Market distortions And many more The defendant and the Cabinet Careful attention must be devoted to the action. Set reasonable guidelines And anti-corruption measures Economy and Finance of But the defendant to the votes together with the cabinet. By restraining measures to prevent damage to put an end to the suspension veto or amend the rules in rice. Causing damage estimated to be evaluated as a numeric digits, and the plaintiff's request to punish the Penal Code section 157, which is punishable by imprisonment of 1-10 years 2,000 - 20,000 baht and up. Assoc.'s. constitution that. The National Anti-Corruption (NCC) Act 2542 Section 123/1 with 1-10 years imprisonment and a fine of 20,000 - 200,000 Baht from Mr. Justice Weerapol own rhetoric. Asked the defendant To give or refuse the squeaking. Ms.. Yingluck. Cummins announced on the court denied the defense request filed with the release of a written statement to complete. No later than July 3, the court asked the prosecution and the defense. To bring witnesses to the trial in this case a mouth. Mr. Yang Boon Chai Chief prosecutor's office stated that the plaintiff has a total of 13 witnesses to attend hearings mouth while Mr. donning the defense lawyers. Witnesses said he would like to cross-examine at least 20 witnesses, some of whom are on the brink of expression. The. The. The. And witnessing some outside expression. NCC Court considered that the Allow the defendant filed its answer to complete the court within 3 days this July by the appointment of evidence on 21 and 28 July at 09.30. The defendant filed a petition in absentia, the court finds that the defendant is liable. Court appointment time If the defendant can not come to any court appearances. Defendants filed a motion to show cause to the court. Consider occasionally While the court ordered the defendant to allow the provisional release. The defendant is prohibited from leaving the Kingdom. Except as permitted by the court then. . Ms.. Yingluck Walking out of the Supreme Court Thanks to the people who were waiting to cheer on the fringes. As people cheered and embraced the flower photography. Ms.. Yingluck. With out that "shot fighter" from the North. West. Yingluck. Volkswagen vans have returned with registration number AZ 333 million, without giving any interview of Mr. Rawi seeing clearly the yard's defense team. Ms.. Yingluck said after this process. It is clear that . Ms.. Yingluck Ready to be brought to justice To demonstrate his innocence in the implementation of the rice. To help farmers ready to present evidence to the court in the proceedings of the court, one at a time. The Court has described the indictment . Ms.. To look, listen and ask. Ms.. It looks to be rejected. Or get that. Ms.. Yingluck has.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..