If employers and managers treated p

If employers and managers treated people properly, valued them by rewarding and praising we would get fewer people maximising their perks," says Prof Cooper.

There is also a legal aspect to the perks dilemma. Under British law at least, most perks are taxable with the employer usually responsible for reporting them to HM Revenue and Customs at the end of the year.

Whatever the sociological reasons for perk maximisation, it will continue to be a daily ethical dilemma for millions of workers across the country. And for the ethicists, it's clear that it isn't just a question of the letter of the law, but also of how we are viewed within an organisation and our duty to set an example.

"The test is would you be embarrassed if everyone else knew you had done it," says Dr Molyneaux.

"It's quite a good rule of thumb. If you are not embarrassed write a thank you letter to be put on public display in the glass atrium of your office. That is quite a good test.

ผลลัพธ์ (แอฟริกา) 1:

As werkgewers en bestuurders mense behoorlik behandel word, gewaardeer hulle deur sinvolle en geprys ons sou kry minder mense hul byvoordele maksimalisering, "sê prof Cooper. Daar is ook 'n Regte aspek van die byvoordele dilemma. Onder Britse wet ten minste, meeste byvoordele belasbaar is. die werkgewer gewoonlik verantwoordelik vir verslaggewing aan HM Inkomste en Doeane aan die einde van die jaar. Ongeag die sosiologiese redes vir Perk Maksimalisering, sal dit voortgaan om 'n daaglikse etiese dilemma vir miljoene werknemers regoor die land wees. en vir die etici, dis. duidelik dat dit nie net 'n kwessie van die letter van die wet nie, maar ook hoe ons beskou Binne 'n organisasie en ons plig om 'n voorbeeld te stel. "die toets is as almal anders sou jy skaam geweet Jy het dit gedoen. , "sê dr Molyneaux. " Dit is nogal 'n goeie reël. As jy nie skaam skryf 'n dankie brief aan die publiek gewys te word in die glas atrium van jou kantoor. Dit is nogal 'n goeie toets.