Management Systems StandardsEventsIRCA 2014 salary surveyAuditing pape การแปล - Management Systems StandardsEventsIRCA 2014 salary surveyAuditing pape อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

Management Systems StandardsEventsI

Management Systems Standards
Events
IRCA 2014 salary survey
Auditing papers
Technical notes
INform
Reviewing and closing nonconformities
Back to front cover >>
The Auditing Practices Group tells you everything you need to know when reviewing and closing nonconformities
puzzleThe value that can be provided to an organization can be enhanced or diminished by the review that an auditor conducts of the organization’s response to a nonconformity, as well as by the "close-out" process that is applied. An auditor will add value by ensuring that the organization has satisfactorily addressed the cause of the nonconformity and completed a corrective action, as this will increase the likelihood of the organization achieving customer satisfaction.
Review of actions in response to a nonconformity

Management system auditors are responsible for reviewing an organization's response to a nonconformity and verifying the effectiveness of actions taken. There should be three parts to the response, depending on the product type or the situation of the nonconformity (see table 1):
Table 1. Response to nonconformity
Correction


or
Analysis of cause
Analysis of cause Correction
Corrective action Corrective action
For example, for software it is inadvisable to implement a correction until the cause is known. Alternatively, if a ‘low brake-pad’ warning light goes on in a vehicle and you correct it by replacing the brake pads before examining if the sensor was faulty, you might fail to resolve the problem.
There are many methods and tools available to an organization for determining the cause of nonconformity, from simple brainstorming to more complex problem-solving techniques. The extent and effectiveness of the corrective actions depends on identifying the true cause. In some cases this will assist an organization to identify and minimize similar nonconformities in other areas.
In reviewing the response of an organization to a nonconformity, the auditor should confirm that documentation and evidence for all three parts are provided by the organization, and are appropriate, before accepting the response. Important elements to verify in the review process include:
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Management Systems StandardsEventsIRCA 2014 salary surveyAuditing papersTechnical notesINformReviewing and closing nonconformitiesBack to front cover >>The Auditing Practices Group tells you everything you need to know when reviewing and closing nonconformitiespuzzleThe value that can be provided to an organization can be enhanced or diminished by the review that an auditor conducts of the organization's response to a nonconformity, as well as by the "close-out" process that is applied. An auditor will add value by ensuring that the organization has satisfactorily addressed the cause of the nonconformity and completed a corrective action, as this will increase the likelihood of the organization achieving customer satisfaction.Review of actions in response to a nonconformityManagement system auditors are responsible for reviewing an organization's response to a nonconformity and verifying the effectiveness of actions taken. There should be three parts to the response, depending on the product type or the situation of the nonconformity (see table 1):Table 1. Response to nonconformityCorrection orAnalysis of causeAnalysis of cause CorrectionCorrective action Corrective actionFor example, for software it is inadvisable to implement a correction until the cause is known. Alternatively, if a 'low brake-pad' warning light goes on in a vehicle and you correct it by replacing the brake pads before examining if the sensor was faulty, you might fail to resolve the problem.There are many methods and tools available to an organization for determining the cause of nonconformity, from simple brainstorming to more complex problem-solving techniques. The extent and effectiveness of the corrective actions depends on identifying the true cause. In some cases this will assist an organization to identify and minimize similar nonconformities in other areas.In reviewing the response of an organization to a nonconformity, the auditor should confirm that documentation and evidence for all three parts are provided by the organization, and are appropriate, before accepting the response. Important elements to verify in the review process include:
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Management Systems Standards

IRCA Events 2014 salary survey


Auditing papers Technical notes INform
Reviewing and closing. Nonconformities
Back to front cover > >
The Auditing Practices Group tells you everything you need to know when reviewing. And closing nonconformities
.PuzzleThe value that can be provided to an organization can be enhanced or diminished by the review that an auditor conducts. Of the organization 's response to, a nonconformity as well as by the "close-out" process that is applied. An auditor will. Add value by ensuring that the organization has satisfactorily addressed the cause of the nonconformity and completed a. Corrective, actionAs this will increase the likelihood of the organization achieving customer satisfaction.
Review of actions in response. To a nonconformity

Management system auditors are responsible for reviewing an organization 's response to a nonconformity. And verifying the effectiveness of actions taken. There should be three parts to, the responseDepending on the product type or the situation of the nonconformity (see Table 1):
Table 1. Response to nonconformity
Correction.




or Analysis of cause Analysis of cause Correction
Corrective action Corrective action
For example for software, it is. Inadvisable to implement a correction until the cause is, Alternatively known.If a 'low brake-pad' warning light goes on in a vehicle and you correct it by replacing the brake pads before examining. If the sensor, was faulty you might fail to resolve the problem.
There are many methods and tools available to an organization. For determining the cause of nonconformity from simple, brainstorming to more complex problem-solving techniques.The extent and effectiveness of the corrective actions depends on identifying the true cause. In some cases this will assist. An organization to identify and minimize similar nonconformities in other areas.
In reviewing the response of an organization. To, a nonconformity the auditor should confirm that documentation and evidence for all three parts are provided by, the organizationAnd, are appropriate before accepting the response. Important elements to verify in the review process include:
.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: