Anti Wi-Fi advocates suggest that w

Anti Wi-Fi advocates suggest that wired connections are a suitable alternative for internet access. The reality is that devices with network ports are becoming increasingly hard to find on contemporary laptops. But it is not just computers. Entire new lines of devices, such as tablets, e-readers and smartphones, have no physical network connections. Restricting Wi-Fi means an entire generation of technology is not useable in classrooms – technology that is often easier for younger students to use than a traditional computer.

However, Wi-Fi is not just about devices in a classroom for the sake of having shiny new technology for technology sake. There are teaching and learning implications when choosing wired vs. wireless access in a learning environment. A wireless school is fundamentally a different learning environment than a wired school.

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Anti Wi-Fi advocates suggest that wired connections are a suitable alternative for Internet access. The reality is that. Devices with network ports are becoming increasingly hard to find on contemporary laptops. But it is not just, computers. Entire new lines of devices such tablets, as, and, e-readers smartphones have no physical network connections. Restricting. Wi-Fi means an entire generation of technology is not useable in classrooms - technology that is often easier for younger. Students to use than a traditional computer.However Wi-Fi is, not just about devices in a classroom for the sake of having shiny new technology for technology, sake. There are teaching and learning implications when choosing wired vs. Wireless access in a learning environment. A wireless. School is fundamentally a different learning environment than a wired school.