Garbage problem in traffic junction will impact more broadly, without proper management
, so education about the involvement of the public in the form of solid waste management in the community, it is necessary
for the purpose so important. Study of solid waste management by people in the community km in 26 to participate. To analyze trends took public participation in solid waste management. To determine the relationship between personal information and knowledge about the outlook for the solid waste took part. And to analyze the policy of solid waste management. By using a combination of research, qualitative research and quantitative research. The sessions three times and ask the people of the community, 287 km in 26. Tano Pu Ta Te Bannangsta district of Yala qualitative data analysis, classification content. The data were analyzed by percentage and chi-square test. The results showed that Patterns of solid waste management in the community km 26 in. That the public opinion has seven types: 1) The Bank of waste 2) the format of junk to exploit new or recycled 3) form of composting 4) Style Contest beautiful house free of junk 5) format. Cleaning is a big 6) forms, rules or regulations issued / adjusted on waste disposal / catch / adjust and 7) formed to raise awareness litter properly. The trend analysis into the involvement of citizens in waste management found that people most likely to be involved in solid waste management (79.79%) to test the relationship between personal information and knowledge. Garbage on the trends appear to be involved. No Relevance Guidelines for the management of solid waste in the community, including "public participation. Subdistrict Community Support km 26 in non-garbage "to waste management in the community away. 26 can be operated in continuous response to patterns of solid waste management.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..