ปริบทคือสถานการณ์ที่บ่งบอกถึงความสั

ปริบทคือสถานการณ์ที่บ่งบอกถึงความสัมพันธ์ของผู้รวมสนทนาซึ่งรวมทั้ง คําพูดและภาษาท่าทาง สิ่งที่กล่าวถึง และผลของคําพูด (ตามความหมายของ Firth, 1957) พรอมกันนี้ Firth ซึ่งเป็นผู้ก่อตั้งภาษาศาสตร์สมัยปจัจุบันของภาษาอังกฤษ ก็ได้ พูดถึงความสัมพันธ์ของปริบทว่า:
Logicians are apt to think of words and propositions as having ‘meaning’ somehow in themselves, apart from participants in contexts of situation. Speakers and listeners do not seem to be necessary. I suggest that voices should not be entirely dissociated from the social context in which they function and that therefore all texts in modern spoken languages should be regarded as having ‘the implication of utterance’, and be referred to typical participants in some generalized context of situation.
(Firth, 1957: 226)
กล่าวสั้น ๆ ก็คือ Firth คิดวาเมื่อจะตีความหมายของคําพูดจะตองพิจารณาถึงปริบท เป็นสําคัญ ในทํานองเดียวกัน Hymes (1962) ก็ได้ให้ความสําคัญของปริบทไว้อย่าง
(i) บุคคลผูรวมในบทสนทนา ซึ่งรวมทั้งผู้พูดหรือผู้เขียน (addressor) และ ผู้ฟังหรือผู้อ่าน (addressee) พรอมทั้งพื้นความรูของผู้รวมสนทนาด้วย
(ii) หัวขอ (topic) ของการสนทนา
(iii) สถานที่และเวลาของบทสนทนา (setting) พรอมทั้งภาษาทาทางของผู
รวมสนทนา
(iv) ภาษาที่ใช้ในการสนทนา(channel) อยู่ในรูปใดคือเป็นภาษาพูดภาษา
เขียน ป้ายประกาศ หรือเครื่องหมายบงบอกเชิงสัญลักษณ์
(v) ภาษาที่พูด (code) เป็นภาษาถิ่น (dialect) ใด ลีลาการพูด (style) เป็น
อย่างไร
(vi) ลักษณะของคําพูดอยูในรูปแบบ (message form) ใด เช่น เป็นจดหมาย
รัก การเทศนา การเล่านิทาน บทกลอน เป็นต้น
(vii) สถานะการณหรือพิธีที่คําพูดนั้น ๆ เกิดขึ้น (event) เช่น ในพิธีแต่งงาน
ในพิธีสวดมนต์ เป็นตน
(viii) จุดประสงค์ของการพูด (purpose)

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1:

The circumstances indicate the quantity article is the relationship of the discussion, which included people, including speech and language, gestures. What was discussed and the results of the speech (by means of the Firth, 1957), which is a blessing-the founder of Firth, language, science, modern English, they spoke of the ปจัจุบัน relationship of the pribotwa:Logicians are apt to think of words and propositions as having 'meaning' somehow in themselves, apart from participants in contexts of situation. Speakers and listeners do not seem to be necessary. I suggest that voices should not be entirely dissociated from the social context in which they function and that therefore all texts in modern spoken languages should be regarded as having 'the implication of utterance', and be referred to typical participants in some generalized context of situation.(Firth, 1957: 226)In short, it is the Firth thinks Wah when it interprets the speech is an important quantity are taken into account as Tong. Similarly, Hymes (1962). the importance of the article.(I) the person phuruam in the conversation, including speaker or author (addressor) and listeners or readers (the addressee) all surfaces blessing-the total focus of discussion with holes.(Ii) request for discussion (topic)(Iii) the place and time of the conversation (setting) the blessing of both Ta-younger.Join the discussion(Iv) the language used in the conversation (channel), which is the spoken language language.Writing a banner or sign a complex symbol to tell bong.(V) the languages spoken (the code) is a dialect (dialect), which is a euphemism for saying it (style)?(Vi) the nature of those words in any format (message form), such as a letter.The failure to love. The poem tells the story Etc.(Vii) the State ceremony, at the words leave or that occurred (event), for example, in a wedding ceremony.In the ceremony of chanting as himself(Viii) the purpose of the speech (the purpose).

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:

Context situation is indicative of the relationship of the participants, which also included. Speech and language What the And the effect of the words (Within the meaning of Firth, 1957) prompted this Firth, the founder of linguistics days the Justice Institute of English, spoke about the relationship of context that:
Logicians are apt to Think of Words and propositions as having 'meaning. 'somehow in themselves, apart from participants in contexts of situation. Speakers and listeners do not seem to be necessary. I suggest that voices should not be entirely dissociated from the social context in which they function and that therefore all texts in modern spoken languages ​​should. be regarded as having 'the implication of Utterance', and be referred to Typical participants in Some generalized context of situation.
(Firth, one thousand nine hundred and fifty-seven: 226)
In short, the Firth considered when interpreting the meaning of the words will be considered. Context is important in similar Hymes (1962) was the importance of context, such as
(i) a person who engaged in the dialogue. Including the speaker or author (addressor) and the listener or the reader (addressee) prompt the ground knowledge of the conversation with
(ii) the request (topic) of the discussion
(iii) the place and time. dialogue (setting) of BGH language gestures of the
participants
(iv) the language used in conversation (channel) in any form is a colloquial
written placard or sign Bong said symbolic
(v) language. Speaking (code) is a dialect (dialect) any speaking style (style) is
, however,
(vi) the manner of speech, the form (message form) any such a letter,
love, preaching, storytelling, poetry, etc.
(vii). status as a speech or ceremony that occurs (event) as a wedding ceremony
in their prayers as
(viii) the purpose of the speech (purpose).

ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:

Context is the relationship of the situation that indicate the buttons, including words and language attitude. What was discussed, and the effect of the words (according to the meaning of Firth.1957) Prom this Firth which is the founder of modern linguistics ปจั present of English, talking about the relationship of context:
Logicians. Are apt to think of words and propositions as having 'meaning', somehow in themselves apart from participants in contexts. Of situation.Speakers and listeners do not seem to be necessary. I suggest that voices should not be entirely dissociated from the social. Context in which they function and that therefore all texts in modern spoken languages should be regarded as having the. ' Implication of utterance ', and be referred to typical participants in some generalized context of situation.
(Firth 1957:,, 226)
.Briefly, it is Firth think when interpreting the word will have to consider the context is important. Similarly Hymes (1962) the importance of context as
.(I) individuals who combine in the dialogue, including the speaker or writer (addressor) and listeners or readers (addressee) พรอมทั้ง background knowledge of the conversation with
(II). Head (topic) of conversation
(III) the time and place of dialogue (setting), including blessings language of the Tata
.The discussion
(IV) language used in conversation (channel). In any form is a spoken language writing, sign or mark
Bong tell symbolic
(V) language spoken (code) is a dialect (dialect). Any style of speaking (style)
how
.(VI) characteristics of words in any format (message form), such as a letter
love, preaching, storytelling, the bolts, etc.)
(VII status? The words. , happen (event), such as wedding ceremony is their prayer.

.(VIII) the purpose of speaking (purpose)
.