ฉันต้องใช้ภาษาอังกฤษถูกหลักไวยากรณ์Literature ReviewThe Allen and Seam การแปล - ฉันต้องใช้ภาษาอังกฤษถูกหลักไวยากรณ์Literature ReviewThe Allen and Seam อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

ฉันต้องใช้ภาษาอังกฤษถูกหลักไวยากรณ์

ฉันต้องใช้ภาษาอังกฤษถูกหลักไวยากรณ์
Literature Review
The Allen and Seaman (2013) report looked at online education, including the growing presence of massive open online courses (MOOCs), from the institutional perspective, not from the student’s. In their report, the authors noted that the remaining barriers to widespread acceptance of online education were lack of faculty and employer acceptance, lack of student discipline and low retention rates. Of these, student retention in online programs is particularly relevant to the discussion of student satisfaction with their online experience. Reinforcing the instructor’s role in designing satisfying online curricula, Kransow (2013) posited that if students were satisfied with their online experiences, they would be more likely to remain in the program.
Kransow (2013) poses a critical question for instructors working in the online environment. How can online courses be designed to maximize student satisfaction as well as student motivation, performance and persistence? Drawing on the literature, Kransow emphasizes the importance of building a sense of community in the online environment. Yet, building an online community that fosters student satisfaction involves strategies that go beyond facilitating interaction with course components. Building community also requires, among other elements, interaction with each other, that is, between student and instructor and among students in the course. Sher (2009), in his study of the role such interactions play in student learning in a Web-based environment, found interaction between student and instructor and among students to be significant factors in student satisfaction and learning.
Interaction—between the student and the instructor, among students, and with course content and technology—was the focus of Strachota’s (2003) study of student
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Do I have to use English grammar.Literature ReviewThe Allen and Seaman (2013) report looked at online education, including the growing presence of massive open online courses (MOOCs), from the institutional perspective, not from the student's. In their report, the authors noted that the remaining barriers to widespread acceptance of online education were lack of faculty and employer acceptance, lack of student discipline and low retention rates. Of these, student retention in online programs is particularly relevant to the discussion of student satisfaction with their online experience. Reinforcing the instructor's role in designing satisfying online curricula, Kransow (2013) posited that if students were satisfied with their online experiences, they would be more likely to remain in the program.Kransow (2013) poses a critical question for instructors working in the online environment. How can online courses be designed to maximize student satisfaction as well as student motivation, performance and persistence? Drawing on the literature, Kransow emphasizes the importance of building a sense of community in the online environment. Yet, building an online community that fosters student satisfaction involves strategies that go beyond facilitating interaction with course components. Building community also requires, among other elements, interaction with each other, that is, between student and instructor and among students in the course. Sher (2009), in his study of the role such interactions play in student learning in a Web-based environment, found interaction between student and instructor and among students to be significant factors in student satisfaction and learning.Interaction—between the student and the instructor, among students, and with course content and technology—was the focus of Strachota's (2003) study of student
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
I have to use the English language is grammatically
Literature Review
The Allen and Seaman (the 2013th) Report looked at online Education, including The Growing Presence of Massive Open online courses (MOOCs), from The Institutional Perspective, Not from The Student's. In their Report,. the authors noted that the remaining barriers to widespread acceptance of online education were lack of faculty and employer acceptance, lack of student discipline and low retention rates. Of these, student retention in online programs is particularly relevant to the discussion of student satisfaction with their online. Experience. Reinforcing The instructor's role in Designing satisfying online curricula, Kransow (2,013th) posited that IF Students were Satisfied with their online experiences, they would be more likely to remain in The Program.
Kransow (the 2013th) poses a Critical question for instructors Working in. the online environment. How can online courses be designed to maximize student satisfaction as well as student motivation, performance and persistence? Drawing on the literature, Kransow emphasizes the importance of building a sense of community in the online environment. Yet, building an online community. that fosters student satisfaction involves strategies that go beyond facilitating interaction with course components. Building community also requires, among other elements, interaction with each other, that is, between student and instructor and among students in the course. Sher (2009), in his. Study of The role Such Interactions Play in Student Learning in a Web-based Environment, Found Interaction between Student and instructor and Among Students to be significant factors in Student satisfaction and Learning.
Interaction-between The Student and The instructor, Among Students, and with. course content and technology-was the focus of Strachota's (2003) study of student.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
I have to use English grammar Literature Review

The Allen and Seaman (2013) report looked at, online education including. The growing presence of massive open online courses (MOOCs), from the institutional perspective not from, the student 's.? In, their reportThe authors noted that the remaining barriers to widespread acceptance of online education were lack of faculty and employer. Acceptance lack of, student discipline and low retention rates. Of these student retention, in online programs is particularly. Relevant to the discussion of student satisfaction with their online experience.Reinforcing the instructor 's role in designing satisfying, online curricula Kransow (2013) posited that if students were. Satisfied with their, online experiences they would be more likely to remain in the program.
Kransow (2013) poses a critical. Question for instructors working in the online environment.How can online courses be designed to maximize student satisfaction as well as student motivation performance and, persistence?? Drawing on, the literature Kransow emphasizes the importance of building a sense of community in the online, environment. Yet.Building an online community that fosters student satisfaction involves strategies that go beyond facilitating interaction. With course components. Building community also requires among elements, other, with interaction each other that is between,,, Student and instructor and among students in the course. Sher (2009),In his study of the role such interactions play in student learning in a, Web-based environment found interaction between. Student and instructor and among students to be significant factors in student satisfaction and learning.
Interaction - between. The student and the instructor among students, and with, course content and technology - was the focus of Strachota 's (2003). Study of student.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: