The last time we heard of CBR was w

The last time we heard of CBR was when the French Deschamp used it to promote their matting system. Since then it's not been mentioned and neither is the CBR stipulated as an aviation requirement for aircraft recovery. The aviation stance on it is you either need roadway or you do not.

As we understand of the CBR tests, these are a ratio that can be applied as an empirical model/calculation to crushed Limestone sub-surface, i.e. it is an indication of the grounds ability to withstand a given load over a given area and the deformation expected.
As different panels/carpets have different spread load abilities coupled with different local soil or sub-strata conditions, stating a CBR is actually quite misleading for the end user.We are quite intrigued as to how Kunz could actually state a CBR with any meaningful clarity. In essence, Kunz statement has very little relation to any particular reality unless they actually test the system under the actual conditions present at the location.

Coming to Kunz claim of their CBR, there is also nothing mentioned in Kunz website on their CBR value. Is it a ploy of KUNZ to try and secure the order!!!. This is why we must get hold of such a 'document/brochure' where Kunz makes such a claim.
Also, having looked at their products and technical description it is clear that their system has a lot more flex than our system therefore our product if subjected to the same trials/tests will exceed their figures in performance.


We can categorically state at this time that our systems performance will exceed the systems as offered by Kunz.

Re the CBR measurement tool, we have never come across such tooling in our 25 years experience, thus unable to point you to a source. We suggest you try your local construction industry.

The last time we heard of CBR was when the French Deschamp used it to promote their matting system. Since then it's not been mentioned and neither is the CBR stipulated as an aviation requirement for aircraft recovery. The aviation stance on it is you either need roadway or you do not.

As we understand of the CBR tests, these are a ratio that can be applied as an empirical model/calculation to crushed Limestone sub-surface, i.e. it is an indication of the grounds ability to withstand a given load over a given area and the deformation expected.
As different panels/carpets have different spread load abilities coupled with different local soil or sub-strata conditions, stating a CBR is actually quite misleading for the end user.We are quite intrigued as to how Kunz could actually state a CBR with any meaningful clarity. In essence, Kunz statement has very little relation to any particular reality unless they actually test the system under the actual conditions present at the location.

Coming to Kunz claim of their CBR, there is also nothing mentioned in Kunz website on their CBR value. Is it a ploy of KUNZ to try and secure the order!!!. This is why we must get hold of such a ‘document/brochure’ where Kunz makes such a claim.
Also, having looked at their products and technical description it is clear that their system has a lot more flex than our system therefore our product if subjected to the same trials/tests will exceed their figures in performance.


We can categorically state at this time that our systems performance will exceed the systems as offered by Kunz.

Re the CBR measurement tool, we have never come across such tooling in our 25 years experience, thus unable to point you to a source. We suggest you try your local construction industry.

The last time we heard of CBR was when the French Deschamp used it to promote their matting system. Since then it s not. ' Been mentioned and neither is the CBR stipulated as an aviation requirement for aircraft recovery. The aviation stance on. It is you either need roadway or you do not.

As we understand of the, CBR testsThese are a ratio that can be applied as an empirical model / calculation to crushed, Limestone sub-surface i.e. It is an. Indication of the grounds ability to withstand a given load over a given area and the deformation expected.
As different. Panels / carpets have different spread load abilities coupled with different local soil or, sub-strata conditionsStating a CBR is actually quite misleading for the end user. We are quite intrigued as to how Kunz could actually state. A CBR with any meaningful clarity. In essence Kunz statement, has very little relation to any particular reality unless. They actually test the system under the actual conditions present at the location.

Coming to Kunz claim of, their CBRThere is also nothing mentioned in Kunz website on their CBR value. Is it a ploy of KUNZ to try and secure the order!!!! This is why we must get hold of such a 'document / brochure' where Kunz makes such a claim.
, AlsoHaving looked at their products and technical description it is clear that their system has a lot more flex than our system. Therefore our product if subjected to the same trials / tests will exceed their figures in performance.


We can categorically. State at this time that our systems performance will exceed the systems as offered by Kunz.

Re the CBR, measurement toolWe have never come across such tooling in our 25 years experience thus unable, to point you to a source. We suggest you. Try your local construction industry.

.