Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from  การแปล - Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from  อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

Tourism marketers are faced with a

Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from unprecedented growth in the tourism industry over the last 50 years. As the phenomenon of tourism has grown, so have the interests of destinations in attracting their share of visitors (Sheehan, Ritchie, & Hudson, 2007). Destination choices available to consumers have proliferated (Pike, 2005). Today's tourism marketers must influence consumer decision making in an increasingly complex and competitive global marketplace. Tourism is a complicated setting involving a diverse group of active stakeholders (Sheehan et al., 2007) who each have different interests in the tourism market (Pike, 2005). For destination stakeholders such as destination marketing organisations (DMOs), ACCOMMODATION providers, and activity operators to survive in an increasingly competitive environment, it is essential that a consistent approach is used by all tourism stakeholders operating within a single destination (Sheehan et al., 2007).

The importance of segmentation in tourism is widely acknowledged (e.g. Bieger & Laesser, 2002; Cha, McCleary, & Uysal, 1995; Kastenholz, Davis, & Paul, 1999). To date research has assisted us to understand which bases can be used by tourism destinations to effectively segment tourism markets (e.g. Dolnicar and Leisch, 2003, Johns and Gyimothy, 2002 and Laesser and Crouch, 2006). Further, these efforts have largely centred upon building tourist profiles for a destination using visitor data (e.g. Frochot, 2005, Hudson and Ritchie, 2002 and Laws et al., 2002). Little research attention has been directed towards understanding how the tourism stakeholders segment their markets. As a result we do not know how tourism stakeholders segment a market for managerial and marketing purposes and whether tourism stakeholder segments mirror the segments defined by DMOs. This case study will contribute to the literature by presenting tourism stakeholder views for one tourism destination. It will identify similarities or discrepancies between the segments defined by the DMO and the segments used by tourism stakeholders for managerial and marketing purposes.
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from unprecedented growth in the tourism industry over the last 50 years. As the phenomenon of tourism has grown, so have the interests of destinations in attracting their share of visitors (Sheehan, Ritchie, & Hudson, 2007). Destination choices available to consumers have proliferated (Pike, 2005). Today's tourism marketers must influence consumer decision making in an increasingly complex and competitive global marketplace. Tourism is a complicated setting involving a diverse group of active stakeholders (Sheehan et al., 2007) who each have different interests in the tourism market (Pike, 2005). For destination stakeholders such as destination marketing organisations (DMOs), ACCOMMODATION providers, and activity operators to survive in an increasingly competitive environment, it is essential that a consistent approach is used by all tourism stakeholders operating within a single destination (Sheehan et al., 2007).The importance of segmentation in tourism is widely acknowledged (e.g. Bieger & Laesser, 2002; Cha, McCleary, & Uysal, 1995; Kastenholz, Davis, & Paul, 1999). To date research has assisted us to understand which bases can be used by tourism destinations to effectively segment tourism markets (e.g. Dolnicar and Leisch, 2003, Johns and Gyimothy, 2002 and Laesser and Crouch, 2006). Further, these efforts have largely centred upon building tourist profiles for a destination using visitor data (e.g. Frochot, 2005, Hudson and Ritchie, 2002 and Laws et al., 2002). Little research attention has been directed towards understanding how the tourism stakeholders segment their markets. As a result we do not know how tourism stakeholders segment a market for managerial and marketing purposes and whether tourism stakeholder segments mirror the segments defined by DMOs. This case study will contribute to the literature by presenting tourism stakeholder views for one tourism destination. It will identify similarities or discrepancies between the segments defined by the DMO and the segments used by tourism stakeholders for managerial and marketing purposes.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from unprecedented growth in the tourism industry over the last 50 years. As the phenomenon of tourism has grown, so have the interests of destinations in attracting their share of visitors (Sheehan, Ritchie, & Hudson, 2007). Destination choices available to consumers have proliferated (Pike, 2005). Today's tourism marketers must influence consumer decision making in an increasingly complex and competitive global marketplace. Tourism is a complicated setting involving a diverse group of active stakeholders (Sheehan et al., 2007) who each have different interests in the tourism market (Pike, 2005). For destination stakeholders such as destination marketing organisations (DMOs), ACCOMMODATION providers, and activity operators to survive in an increasingly competitive environment, it is essential that a consistent approach is used by all tourism stakeholders operating within a single destination (Sheehan et al.,. 2007). The Importance of segmentation in Tourism is widely acknowledged (eg Bieger & Laesser, 2,002th; Cha, McCleary, & Uysal, 1995; Kastenholz, Davis, & Paul, 1999). To date research has assisted us to understand which bases can be used by tourism destinations to effectively segment tourism markets (eg Dolnicar and Leisch, 2003, Johns and Gyimothy, 2002 and Laesser and Crouch, 2006). Further, these efforts have largely centred upon building tourist profiles for a destination using visitor data (eg Frochot, 2005, Hudson and Ritchie, 2002 and Laws et al., 2002). Little research attention has been directed towards understanding how the tourism stakeholders segment their markets. As a result we do not know how tourism stakeholders segment a market for managerial and marketing purposes and whether tourism stakeholder segments mirror the segments defined by DMOs. This case study will contribute to the literature by presenting tourism stakeholder views for one tourism destination. It will identify similarities or discrepancies between the segments defined by the DMO and the segments used by tourism stakeholders for managerial and marketing purposes.


การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
Tourism marketers are faced with a complex environment resulting from unprecedented growth in the tourism industry over. The last 50 years. As the phenomenon of tourism, has grown so have the interests of destinations in attracting their share. Of visitors (,,, Sheehan Ritchie & Hudson 2007). Destination choices available to consumers have proliferated Pike 2005 (,).Today 's tourism marketers must influence consumer decision making in an increasingly complex and competitive global, marketplace. Tourism is a complicated setting involving a diverse group of active stakeholders (Sheehan et al, 2007) who each have different. Interests in the tourism, market (Pike 2005). For destination stakeholders such as destination marketing organisations (DMOs),ACCOMMODATION providers and activity, operators to survive in an increasingly competitive environment it is, essential. That a consistent approach is used by all tourism stakeholders operating within a single destination (Sheehan et al, 2007).

The. Importance of segmentation in tourism is widely acknowledged (e.g. Bieger & Laesser 2002; Cha,,,, McCleary & Uysal 1995;? ,, Kastenholz Davis&, Paul 1999). To date research has assisted us to understand which bases can be used by tourism destinations to effectively. Segment tourism markets (e.g. Dolnicar and Leisch 2003 Johns and Gyimothy,,, and 2002 Laesser and Crouch 2006). Further,,, These efforts have largely centred upon building tourist profiles for a destination using visitor data (e.g. Frochot 2005 Hudson,,, And, Ritchie2002 and Laws et al, 2002). Little research attention has been directed towards understanding how the tourism stakeholders. Segment their markets. As a result we do not know how tourism stakeholders segment a market for managerial and marketing. Purposes and whether tourism stakeholder segments mirror the segments defined by DMOs.This case study will contribute to the literature by presenting tourism stakeholder views for one tourism, destination. It will identify similarities or discrepancies between the segments defined by the DMO and the segments used by tourism. Stakeholders for managerial and marketing purposes.
.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2026 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: