However, a fundamental problem of decision theory is how to derive the การแปล - However, a fundamental problem of decision theory is how to derive the อังกฤษ วิธีการพูด

However, a fundamental problem of d

However, a fundamental problem of decision theory is how to derive the relative weights of the criteria. A well-known weight evaluation method is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method has steps including specifying the hierarchical structure, determining the relative important weights of the criteria and sub-criteria, assigning preferred weights of each alternative and determining the final score [6]. Abidin [7] identified a set of 15 criteria and 58 indicators for sustainable ecotourism management in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia. The Delphi method and public survey were used to solicit opinions from an interdisciplinary panel of Malaysian experts and public groups regarding the suitable criteria and indicators of sustainability for TNNP. Bukenya [8] employed six criteria (high number of species, wildlife management potential, endangered species, potential to attract more tourists, less susceptibility to encroachment and degradation over long period) to prioritize the potential national parks in Uganda, based on the stated objectives and criteria for the development of ecotourism industry. The site specific criteria and indicators can be developed with stakeholders’ participation. Boyd et al. [9] identified the following criteria: naturalness, wildlife, cultural heritage, landscape and community for ecotourism within Northern Ontario by linking their importance criteria with the actual landscape characteristics of this region. Kenan [1], using multiple criteria selected ecotourism planning activities in Igneada. The model was applied using participatory approach which consisted of 19 alternates and 28 criteria based on an ELECTRE method. Kumari et al. [10] integrated five indicators (wildlife distribution, ecological value, ecotourism attractively, environmental resiliency and ecotourism diversity) in order to identify and prioritize the potential ecotourism sites in West District of Sikkim state in India.
0/5000
จาก: -
เป็น: -
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 1: [สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
However, a fundamental problem of decision theory is how to derive the relative weights of the criteria. A well-known weight evaluation method is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method has steps including specifying the hierarchical structure, determining the relative important weights of the criteria and sub-criteria, assigning preferred weights of each alternative and determining the final score [6]. Abidin [7] identified a set of 15 criteria and 58 indicators for sustainable ecotourism management in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia. The Delphi method and public survey were used to solicit opinions from an interdisciplinary panel of Malaysian experts and public groups regarding the suitable criteria and indicators of sustainability for TNNP. Bukenya [8] employed six criteria (high number of species, wildlife management potential, endangered species, potential to attract more tourists, less susceptibility to encroachment and degradation over long period) to prioritize the potential national parks in Uganda, based on the stated objectives and criteria for the development of ecotourism industry. The site specific criteria and indicators can be developed with stakeholders' participation. Boyd et al. [9] identified the following criteria: naturalness, wildlife, cultural heritage, landscape and community for ecotourism within Northern Ontario by linking their importance criteria with the actual landscape characteristics of this region. Kenan [1], using multiple criteria selected ecotourism planning activities in Igneada. The model was applied using participatory approach which consisted of 19 alternates and 28 criteria based on an ELECTRE method. Kumari et al. [10] integrated five indicators (wildlife distribution, ecological value, ecotourism attractively, environmental resiliency and ecotourism diversity) in order to identify and prioritize the potential ecotourism sites in West District of Sikkim state in India.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 2:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
However, a fundamental problem of decision theory is how to derive the relative weights of the criteria. A well-known weight evaluation method is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method has steps including specifying the hierarchical structure, determining the relative important weights of the criteria and sub-criteria, assigning preferred weights of each alternative and determining the final score [6]. Abidin [7] identified a set of 15 criteria and 58 indicators for sustainable ecotourism management in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia. The Delphi method and public survey were used to solicit opinions from an interdisciplinary panel of Malaysian experts and public groups regarding the suitable criteria and indicators of sustainability for TNNP. Bukenya [8] employed six criteria (high number of species, wildlife management potential, endangered species, potential to attract more tourists, less susceptibility to encroachment and degradation over long period) to prioritize the potential national parks in Uganda, based on the stated objectives. and criteria for the development of ecotourism industry. The site specific criteria and indicators can be developed with stakeholders' participation. Boyd et al. [9] identified the following criteria: naturalness, wildlife, cultural heritage, landscape and community for ecotourism within Northern Ontario by linking their importance criteria with the actual landscape characteristics of this region. Kenan [1], using multiple criteria selected ecotourism planning activities in Igneada. The model was applied using participatory approach which consisted of 19 alternates and 28 criteria based on an ELECTRE method. Kumari et al. [10] integrated five indicators (wildlife distribution, ecological value, ecotourism attractively, environmental resiliency and ecotourism diversity) in order to identify and prioritize the potential ecotourism sites in West District of Sikkim state in India.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ผลลัพธ์ (อังกฤษ) 3:[สำเนา]
คัดลอก!
However a fundamental, problem of decision theory is how to derive the relative weights of the criteria. A well-known weight. Evaluation method is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method has steps including specifying the hierarchical. Structure determining the, relative important weights of the criteria, and sub-criteria assigning preferred weights of each. Alternative and determining the final score [6]. Abidin [] identified 7 a set of 15 criteria and 58 indicators for sustainable. Ecotourism management in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia. The Delphi method and public survey were used to solicit. Opinions from an interdisciplinary panel of Malaysian experts and public groups regarding the suitable criteria and indicators. Of sustainability for TNNP. Bukenya [] employed 8 six criteria (high number of species wildlife management potential endangered,,, Species potential to, attract, more tourists less susceptibility to encroachment and degradation over long period) to prioritize. The potential national parks, in Uganda based on the stated objectives and criteria for the development of ecotourism, industry. The site specific criteria and indicators can be developed with stakeholders" participation. Boyd et al. [], 9 identified The following criteria:,,, naturalness wildlife cultural heritage landscape and community for ecotourism within Northern. Ontario by linking their importance criteria with the actual landscape characteristics of this region. Kenan [1], using. Multiple criteria selected ecotourism planning activities in Igneada. The model was applied using participatory approach. Which consisted of 19 alternates and 28 criteria based on an ELECTRE method. Kumari et al. [] integrated 10 five indicators. (Wildlife distribution ecological, attractively, value ecotourism, resiliency environmental and ecotourism diversity in.) Order to identify and prioritize the potential ecotourism sites in West District of Sikkim state in India.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
 
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: