However a fundamental, problem of decision theory is how to derive the relative weights of the criteria. A well-known weight. Evaluation method is the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). This method has steps including specifying the hierarchical. Structure determining the, relative important weights of the criteria, and sub-criteria assigning preferred weights of each. Alternative and determining the final score [6]. Abidin [] identified 7 a set of 15 criteria and 58 indicators for sustainable. Ecotourism management in Taman Negara National Park (TNNP), Malaysia. The Delphi method and public survey were used to solicit. Opinions from an interdisciplinary panel of Malaysian experts and public groups regarding the suitable criteria and indicators. Of sustainability for TNNP. Bukenya [] employed 8 six criteria (high number of species wildlife management potential endangered,,, Species potential to, attract, more tourists less susceptibility to encroachment and degradation over long period) to prioritize. The potential national parks, in Uganda based on the stated objectives and criteria for the development of ecotourism, industry. The site specific criteria and indicators can be developed with stakeholders" participation. Boyd et al. [], 9 identified The following criteria:,,, naturalness wildlife cultural heritage landscape and community for ecotourism within Northern. Ontario by linking their importance criteria with the actual landscape characteristics of this region. Kenan [1], using. Multiple criteria selected ecotourism planning activities in Igneada. The model was applied using participatory approach. Which consisted of 19 alternates and 28 criteria based on an ELECTRE method. Kumari et al. [] integrated 10 five indicators. (Wildlife distribution ecological, attractively, value ecotourism, resiliency environmental and ecotourism diversity in.) Order to identify and prioritize the potential ecotourism sites in West District of Sikkim state in India.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
