Light availability had a stronger effect on growth rate and
plant morphology than temperature for all species. RGR of all
three. Species increased approximately three-fold from low to high
light availability but varied, little, with temperature suggesting. A
rather flat response to temperature with a growth optimum in the
range 20 - 30 cream C. However for, L. Major there was a great. Decline
.At 30 cream C both in growth rate and, photosynthetic rate indicating
stress responses to summer mean temperatures above 25 C, education level. In
a microcosm experiment McKee et, al. (2002) also found that L.
major growth favored summer temperature around 25 C, education level. The relative
growth rates were within the range of previous studies on the
three species (Table 3). Photosynthetic rates. Were the only parameter
.For which temperature had an equal or stronger effect than
light availability. We found that as mean summer water temperature
increased. From 20 cream C to 30 cream C there was a general increase in
photosynthetic rates for E. Densa and E. Canadensis and for L. Major
between 20 and 25 C, education level. This is a typical response following effects of
temperature on enzymatic processes in the photosynthetic process
.(Berry, and Raison 1981).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..